For the first time last week, I blocked advisors from the pension sector.

For the first time last week, I blocked advisors from the pension sector. I would like to talk about the content, but not if people play the conspiracy card.

I have now been litigating for 12 years for entrepreneurs and semi-public institutions (such as healthcare institutions) about the liquidity surcharge introduced from 2009.

In 2015, my client won on appeal and in 2019 at the Supreme Court on the grounds of error about the collateral (monitoring) of interest rate swaps and the liquidity risk involved. 

In 2018, however, something 'strange' happened. The Rechtbank Amsterdam asked preliminary questions to the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden and left out an important part of the (legal) debate: the statutory margin waiver obligation (art. 86 Bgfo) that affected the liquidity position of my clients (and clients of the bank). Since then, both the Amsterdam District Court and the Gerechtshof Amsterdam have disregarded all facts and legal grounds submitted with regard to collateral (management) in proceedings. In doing so, judges systematically violate (among other things) Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 

My clients (and those of other lawyers such as Jan Michiel Wagenaar ) are still litigating about this liquidity surcharge. This surcharge has nothing to do with the increase in the price of money on the money market (Euribor), but is the result of a large-scale collateral operation that banks have secretly carried out since 2009.

The pension funds and investment funds of ABP and PFZW have been abused to conceal (and guarantee) EUR 200 billion in banks' collateral deficits. The parliamentary inquiry into the financial system stated that banks needed EUR 200 billion in guarantees (state aid) in 2008, but not that this was collateral for OTC derivatives. At the end of 2008, the state aid (EU guarantee scheme of the EC and ECB) suddenly turned out to be no longer necessary. 

It was concealed in the parliamentary inquiry that ABP and PFZW were used for the banks' cart. It will probably have been considered that in the new financial system (called "Banking Model 3.0" in Worst Bank Scenario ) this liquidity is also borrowed from the pension pots (very lucrative business; the reason that American parties such as Apollo, Goldman Sachs and Marsh McLennan (Cardano) have taken over the Dutch pension asset managers/pension insurers).

My clients have the right to a fair trial and I must be able to practice my profession adequately as a lawyer. That means that I no longer want to see advisors who were involved in these malicious practices and shouting "conspiracy" in my timeline. After 12 years of litigation and 10 years of whistleblowing, I am done with that.

When I received my 1st report of collateral fraud to the Autoriteit Financiële Markten in 2014, I could never have imagined that it involved EUR 200 billion of collateral fraud. 

However, I 'just' do my job as a lawyer and am a whistleblower against my will.